Modelling responses of forages to climate change with a focus on nutritive value

Perttu Virkajärvi, Panu Korhonen, Gianni Bellocchi, Yannick Curnel, Lianhai Wu, Guillaume Jégo, Tomas Persson, Mats Höglind, Marcel van Oijen, Anne-Maj Gustavsson, Richard P. Kipling, Alan Rotz, Taru Palosuo, Pierluigi Calanca, Jantine van Middelkoop

Abstract


European livestock agriculture is extraordinarily diverse, and so are the challenges it faces. This diversity has contributed to the development of a fragmented set of research communities. As a result, livestock research is often under-represented at policy level, despite its high relevance for the environment and food security.

Understanding livestock systems and how they can sustainably adapt to global change requires inputs across research areas, including grasslands, nutrition, health, welfare and ecology. It also requires experimental researchers, modellers and stakeholders to work closely together.

Networks and capacity building structures are vital to enable livestock research to meet the challenges of climate change. They need to maintain shared resources and provide non-competitive arenas to share and synthesize results for policy support.  

Long term strategic investment is needed to support such structures. Their leadership requires very different skills to those effective in scientific project coordination.


Full Text:

Summary Article

References


Bonesmo H and Bélanger G 2002. Timothy yield and nutritive value by the CATIMO Model: II. Digestibility and fiber. Agronomy Journal 94, 345–350.

Graux AI, Gaurut M, Agabriel J, Baumont R, Delagarde R, Delaby L and Soussana JF 2011. Development of the pasture simulation model for assessing livestock production under climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 144, 69–91.

Gustavsson AM, Angus JF and Torssell BWR 1995. An integrated model for growth and nutritional value of timothy. Agricultural Systems 47, 73–92.

Höglind M, Van Oijen M, Cameron D and Persson T 2016. Process-based simulation of growth and overwintering of grassland using the BASGRA model. Ecological Modelling 335, 1–15.

Jégo G, Bélanger G, Tremblay GF, Jing Q and Baron VS 2013. Calibration and performance evaluation of the STICS crop model for simulating timothy growth and nutritive value. Field Crops Research 151, 65–77.

Rotz CA, Corson MS, Chianese DS, Hafner SD, Jarvis R and Coiner CU 2015. The integrated farm system model – reference manual – version 4.2, September 2015. Retrieved on 2 June 2016 from http://www.ars.usda.gov/sp2UserFiles/ Place/19020500/Reference%20Manual.pdf.

Stilmant D, Rabier F, Dufrasne S, Oger R and Buffet D 2001. Prévision des quantités et des qualités des fourrages disponibles: aide à l'établissement d’une stratégie alimentaire à l'échelle de l’exploitation et de la région agricole. Rapport final. Telsat 4. Ministère des Classes moyennes et de l’Agriculture, CRA, Section Biométrie, Gestion des données et Agrométéorologie, Programme de recherche ‘Observation de la terre par satellite’. Gembloux, 85pp. (in French).

Wu L, McGechan MB, McRoberts N, Baddeley JA and Watson CA 2007. SPACSYS: integration of a 3D root architecture component to carbon, nitrogen and water cycling-model description. Ecological Modelling 200, 343–359.

Zaka S, Frak E., Julier B, Gastal F and Louarn G 2016. Intraspecific variation in thermal acclimation of photosynthesis across a range of temperatures in a perennial crop. AoB PLANTS 48p. Available at http://aobpla.oxfordjournals.org.




Previous issues and volumes can be found in the 'Archives' section.

You can refer to a paper published in this series in the following format Author (2013) Title. FACCE MACSUR Reports 2: D-C1.3, where "D-C1.3" is the article ID en lieu of page range.