Strategies for engagement on adaptation and mitigation with national and EU policy makers and with the agro-‐food chain sector (Update)
Abstract
This report is grounded on the hypotheses, methodologies and approaches for stakeholder mapping designed during the early stages of MACSUR and described in the previous report1. It describes the kind of activities conducted by the WPC6-3-4 MACSUR team and the emerging design of activities for the second phase of MACSUR (2015-2017).
The designed process of strategic stakeholder mapping was implemented by some of the teams involved in the task and through hub initiatives. Key actions were the (i) development of suitable intermediary objects to engage with stakeholders, through the regional pilot case studies, (ii) the design and implementation of key events (we report here the case of the Agroscenari event at the case study scale, the national event between the MACSUR Italian partnership with Italian policy makers held in Rome in July 2014, the international stakeholder events at the MACSUR mid term meeting in Sassari (April 2014), and the one held in Bruxelles on 6 May 2015) and (iii) the process of stakeholder and stakeholding mapping at the case study scale.
Results indicate that when dealing with high level stakeholders (e.g. institutional or large agro-food enterprises), occasional stakeholder events will only serve as opportunity for showcasing and possibly for a data collection useful for researchers, with almost no impact on the ongoing social learning process sought by the designed activities. At the case study scale, instead, the long term and ongoing activities can generate new spaces for mutual learning and knowledge hybridization, through a variety of mediating objects emerging from the continuous interactions. The lesson learned is that the engagement of high level stakeholders can be effective insofar they are somehow involved in the interactions with stakeholders at the case study scale, as this can provide a key experience leading to a change in understanding about the nature of the issues that can ultimately result into a change in practice. These results will be the basis for the design of new strategies for engaging EU policy makers and large agro-food energy representatives in the second phase of MACSUR.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bawden, R., Ison, R., 1992. The purposes of field-crop ecosystems: social and economic aspects. Ecosystems of the World 18, 11-35.
Collins, K., Ison, R., 2009. Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance 19, 358-373.
Ison, R., 2010. Juggling the M-Ball: Managing Overall Performance in a Situation, Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World. Springer, pp. 185-213.
Ison, R., Röling, N., & Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 499-511.
Ison, R., Collins, K., Colvin, J., Jiggins, J., Roggero, P.P., Seddaiu, G., Steyaert, P., Toderi, M., Zanolla, C., 2011. Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water resources management 25, 3977-3992.
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., Ingold, K., 2013. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management 125, 134-148.
Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A., 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1.
Rodríguez, H., Fisher, E., Schuurbiers, D., 2013. Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations. Research Policy.
Roggero, P.P., Seddaiu, G., Toderi, M., 2006. Stakeholder analysis for sharing agro-environment issues towards concerted action: a case study on diffuse nitrate pollution. Italian Journal of Agronomy 1, 727-740.
Steyaert, P., Barzman, M., Billaud, J. P., Brives, H., Hubert, B., Ollivier, G., & Roche, B. (2007). The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 537-550.
Steyaert, P., Jiggins, J., 2007. Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 575-586.
Toderi, M., Powell, N., Seddaiu, G., Roggero, P.P., Gibbon, D., 2007. Combining social learning with agro-ecological research practice for more effective management of nitrate pollution. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 551-563.
Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Smith, M. S., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Van Garderen, E. A., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, 28, 325-336.
Previous issues and volumes can be found in the 'Archives' section.
You can refer to a paper published in this series in the following format Author (2013) Title. FACCE MACSUR Reports 2: D-C1.3, where "D-C1.3" is the article ID en lieu of page range.