ReviewKey challenges and priorities for modelling European grasslands under climate change
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The agricultural sector is facing unprecedented challenges as it attempts to maintain food security in the context of climate and socio-economic change (Soussana, 2014, Thornton, 2010). The forecasted increase of world population, dietary changes towards increasing meat consumption and the demand for bioenergy suggest a global requirement for agricultural products by 2050 roughly twice that of today (Foley et al., 2011). At the same time as increasing production, the livestock sector will need to improve efficiency (Thornton, 2010) to avoid increasing the 26% of global land area currently used for livestock production, and to reduce its estimated 15% share of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Ripple et al., 2014). Havlík et al. (2014) suggest that transitions from grass-based to more intensive livestock production systems may represent a cost-effective approach to mitigating GHG emissions from livestock agriculture. However, while grass-based ruminant production systems may be less efficient in terms of GHG emissions and land use than more intensive systems, they provide a range of other benefits; European grasslands store an estimated 5.5 Gt of carbon in the top 30 cm of their soils (Lugato et al., 2014). Covering around 30% of agricultural land in Europe (Huyghe et al., 2014), grasslands also play an important role in the maintenance of biodiversity and the sustenance of rural communities and cultures (Soussana and Lemaire, 2014). Intensification or conversion of grasslands to crop production can lead to the reduction or loss of such benefits (Dusseux et al., 2015). At the same time, ruminants valorise marginal production areas, converting plant materials indigestible to humans into meat and dairy products with high efficiency in terms of the consumption of human-edible food per unit of product (Wheeler and Reynolds, 2013, Wilkinson, 2011). In Europe, around 25% of livestock protein intake comes from grasslands (Leip et al., 2011). Despite these benefits, grasslands have declined in Europe, with an estimated loss of seven million hectares between 1967 and 2007 (Huyghe et al., 2014). Recent predictions suggest that this decline may continue in a climate change future (Leclère et al., 2013). In this context, a better understanding is required of the impacts of climate change on European grassland systems, the efficacy of adaptation strategies to increase their resilience and productivity, and the pathways available to maintain and enhance the essential ecosystem services they provide (Scollan et al., 2010, Smith et al., 2013).
In light of the challenges described, modelling can offer valuable support to farm and policy level decision-makers, by providing tools to explore the performance of biophysical, management and policy systems in the context of future climatic and socio-economic scenarios (Graux et al., 2013, Kipling et al., 2014). A number of high-level strategic assessments of agricultural research priorities (ATF, 2013, ATF, 2014, FACCE-JPI, 2012, Soussana, 2014) present a range of challenges to the agricultural modelling community (Kipling et al., in press). The aim of this paper is to lay out in detail the specific challenges and research priorities that grassland modelling must address, if it is to fulfil its potential role in helping to tackle the global problems faced by the livestock production sector. The focus of the paper is on European grasslands, and covers both permanent grasslands and leys (grasslands established for less than five years). Three broad types of model applied to European grasslands have previously been identified (Bellocchi et al., 2013); specialised grassland models, crop models with grassland options, and vegetation models that can characterise a range of plant communities including grasslands. This paper incorporates challenges relevant for all of these model types, and explores links to other modelling disciplines and approaches.
Section snippets
Methods
In order to understand the challenges and research priorities for grassland modelling, a ‘horizon scanning’ approach based on that of Pretty et al. (2010) was used to gain the views of grassland modellers and researchers from 18 institutes across 10 countries. The experts were drawn from, or known to, partners contributing to a large European modelling network, the Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change Joint Programming Initiative (FACCE JPI) knowledge hub Modelling European Agriculture
Challenges and priorities for modelling
The workshop and questionnaire responses identified fifteen challenges. Twelve of these could be categorized using the different aspects of grassland systems under climate change depicted in Fig. 1, and three were cross-cutting challenges (Table 1). The first category of challenges relate to ‘direct and indirect climate change effects on the sward’. Challenges one to three refer to biophysical interactions which will require improved modelling in the context of climate change. These are
Synthesis
The fifteen challenges for grassland modelling identified here (Table 1) cover all aspects of modelling. Although many of the challenges have been discussed in previous reviews, such as Bryant and Snow (2008); Snow et al. (2014) and Holzworth et al. (2015), to the authors' knowledge this has been the first attempt to comprehensively assess the challenges and priorities for European grassland modelling in the context of climate change, using a collaborative horizon scanning approach. In
Conclusions
The horizon scanning exercise presented in this paper identified 15 challenges to European grassland modelling in the context of climate change (Table 1), considered the current state of modelling in relation to each challenge, and presented pathways to improving model capacity. The responses of participants to this exercise highlighted the need for the creation of shared resources within the grassland modelling community, in order to 1) allow stakeholders to identify and select modelling tools
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the FACCE-JPI knowledge hub MACSUR with national funding from BBSRC and Scottish Government (UK), EL&I (The Netherlands), INRA (France), MIPAAF (Italy), MMM (Finland), RCN (Norway), SPW (Belgium), The National Centre for Research and Development (Poland), FORMAS (Sweden), JÜLICH and BLE (Germany). The authors would like to thank Dr. Panu Korhonen (Luke) and two anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the revision of this paper.
References (141)
- et al.
Plant molecular stress responses face climate change
Trends Plant Sci.
(2010) - et al.
Contrasting land uses in Mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral systems generated patchy diversity patterns of vascular plants and below-ground microorganisms
C. R. Biol.
(2014) - et al.
Bayesian calibration of the Pasture Simulation model (PaSim) to simulate European grasslands under water stress
Ecological Informatics
(2015) - et al.
Screening parameters in the Pasture Simulation model using the Morris method
Ecol. Model.
(2013) - et al.
Modelling the course of frost tolerance in winter wheat: I. Model development
Eur. J. Agron.
(2008) - et al.
Stability of above-ground and below-ground processes to extreme drought in model grassland ecosystems: interactions with plant species diversity and soil nitrogen availability
- et al.
Testing the ability of a simple grassland model to simulate the seasonal effects of drought on herbage growth
Field Crop Res.
(2016) - et al.
An open platform to assess vulnerabilities to climate change: an application to agricultural systems
Ecological Informatics
(2015) - et al.
Ensemble modelling of climate change risks and opportunities for managed grasslands in France
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(2013) - et al.
Assessing uncertainties in impact of climate change on grass production in northern Europe using ensembles of global climate models
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(2013)
Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects
Environ. Model Softw.
Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe
Agric. Water Manag.
Calibration and performance evaluation of the STICS crop model for simulating timothy growth and nutritive value
Field Crop Res.
Improved snow-cover model for multi-annual simulations with the STICS crop model under cold, humid continental climates
Agric. For. Meteorol.
Regrowth simulation of the perennial grass timothy
Ecol. Model.
Analysis and classification of data sets for calibration and validation of agro-ecosystem models
Environ. Model Softw.
Dynamics of grass-clover mixtures-an analysis of the response to management with the PROductive GRASsland Simulator (PROGRASS)
Ecol. Model.
Farm-level autonomous adaptation of European agricultural supply to climate change
Ecol. Econ.
Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers
Field Crop Res.
More than taking the heat: crops and global change
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
Understanding the nested, multi-scale, spatial and hierarchical nature of future climate change adaptation decision making in agricultural regions: a narrative literature review
J. Rural. Stud.
Landscape and field characteristics affecting winter waterfowl grazing damage to agricultural perennial forage crops on the lower Fraser River delta, BC, Canada
Crop. Prot.
Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
Interactions among agricultural production and other ecosystem services delivered from European temperate grasslands
Adv. Agron.
Overwintering of herbaceous plants in a changing climate. Still more questions than answers
Plant Sci.
Isolated cork oak trees affect soil properties and biodiversity in a Mediterranean wooded grassland
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
Modelling of grassland fluxes in Europe: evaluation of two biogeochemical models
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
The effect of grazing management on livestock exposure to parasites via the faecal–oral route
Prev. Vet. Med.
Social and ecological resilience: are they related?
Prog. Hum. Geogr.
Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 11
Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning
J. Oper. Res. Soc.
AgMIP's transdisciplinary agricultural systems approach to regional integrated assessment of climate impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation
Research and innovation for a sustainable livestock sector in Europe: suggested priorities for support under Horizon 2020 to enhance innovation and sustainability in the animal production sector of Europe's food supply chains
Research and innovation for a competitive and sustainable animal production sector in Europe: recommended priorities for support under Horizon 2020 in the 2016/2017 programme
Interactively modelling land profitability to estimate European agricultural and forest land use under future scenarios of climate, socio-economics and adaptation
Clim. Chang.
FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem–scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities
Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.
Identified grassland-livestock production systems and related models
Deliberative processes for comprehensive evaluation of agroecological models. A review
Agron. Sustain. Dev.
Yield and nutritive value of timothy as affected by temperature, photoperiod and time of harvest
Grass Forage Sci.
Maintenance of plant species diversity by pathogens
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.
Interactions between above- and belowground biota: importance for small-scale vegetation mosaics in a grassland ecosystem
Oikos
Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Modelling pastoral farm agro-ecosystems: a review
N. Z. J. Agric. Res.
General resilience to cope with extreme events
Sustainability
Combined use of FORMOSAT-2 images with a crop model for biomass and water monitoring of permanent grassland in Mediterranean region
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.
Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
Competitive forbs in high-producing temporary grasslands with perennial ryegrass and red clover can increase plant diversity and herbage yield
Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature
Glob. Chang. Biol.
Cited by (57)
Adapting the grassland model BASGRA to simulate yield and nutritive value of whole-crop barley
2024, European Journal of AgronomySensitivity of simulated soil water content, evapotranspiration, gross primary production and biomass to climate change factors in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands
2023, Agricultural and Forest MeteorologySoil metagenomics in grasslands and forests – A review and bibliometric analysis
2021, Applied Soil EcologyInferring management and predicting sub-field scale C dynamics in UK grasslands using biogeochemical modelling and satellite-derived leaf area data
2021, Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyDynamic simulation of management events for assessing impacts of climate change on pre-alpine grassland productivity
2021, European Journal of AgronomyCitation Excerpt :Our study demonstrates the importance of dynamic rules for adapting management activities to changing environmental conditions in the context of model-based assessments of climate change impacts on grassland productivity. This finding highly supports the statement of Kipling et al. (2016) that the application and validation of different management strategies suitable for climate change conditions remains a key challenge for modelling studies targeting European grassland systems. We successfully implemented our dynamic management module with a focus on pre-alpine grassland systems, yet we argue that setting cuts on the fly of simulations is feasible also for other regions of concern.
DynaGraM: A process-based model to simulate multi-species plant community dynamics in managed grasslands
2021, Ecological Modelling