Review
Key challenges and priorities for modelling European grasslands under climate change

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.144Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Experts identified challenges for European grassland modelling under climate change.

  • Fifteen key challenges and associated research priorities were identified.

  • Challenges related to specific climate change impacts, adaptation and methodology

  • Across challenges, shared resources for stakeholders and researchers were priorities.

Abstract

Grassland-based ruminant production systems are integral to sustainable food production in Europe, converting plant materials indigestible to humans into nutritious food, while providing a range of environmental and cultural benefits. Climate change poses significant challenges for such systems, their productivity and the wider benefits they supply. In this context, grassland models have an important role in predicting and understanding the impacts of climate change on grassland systems, and assessing the efficacy of potential adaptation and mitigation strategies. In order to identify the key challenges for European grassland modelling under climate change, modellers and researchers from across Europe were consulted via workshop and questionnaire. Participants identified fifteen challenges and considered the current state of modelling and priorities for future research in relation to each. A review of literature was undertaken to corroborate and enrich the information provided during the horizon scanning activities. Challenges were in four categories relating to: 1) the direct and indirect effects of climate change on the sward 2) climate change effects on grassland systems outputs 3) mediation of climate change impacts by site, system and management and 4) cross-cutting methodological issues. While research priorities differed between challenges, an underlying theme was the need for accessible, shared inventories of models, approaches and data, as a resource for stakeholders and to stimulate new research. Developing grassland models to effectively support efforts to tackle climate change impacts, while increasing productivity and enhancing ecosystem services, will require engagement with stakeholders and policy-makers, as well as modellers and experimental researchers across many disciplines. The challenges and priorities identified are intended to be a resource 1) for grassland modellers and experimental researchers, to stimulate the development of new research directions and collaborative opportunities, and 2) for policy-makers involved in shaping the research agenda for European grassland modelling under climate change.

Introduction

The agricultural sector is facing unprecedented challenges as it attempts to maintain food security in the context of climate and socio-economic change (Soussana, 2014, Thornton, 2010). The forecasted increase of world population, dietary changes towards increasing meat consumption and the demand for bioenergy suggest a global requirement for agricultural products by 2050 roughly twice that of today (Foley et al., 2011). At the same time as increasing production, the livestock sector will need to improve efficiency (Thornton, 2010) to avoid increasing the 26% of global land area currently used for livestock production, and to reduce its estimated 15% share of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Ripple et al., 2014). Havlík et al. (2014) suggest that transitions from grass-based to more intensive livestock production systems may represent a cost-effective approach to mitigating GHG emissions from livestock agriculture. However, while grass-based ruminant production systems may be less efficient in terms of GHG emissions and land use than more intensive systems, they provide a range of other benefits; European grasslands store an estimated 5.5 Gt of carbon in the top 30 cm of their soils (Lugato et al., 2014). Covering around 30% of agricultural land in Europe (Huyghe et al., 2014), grasslands also play an important role in the maintenance of biodiversity and the sustenance of rural communities and cultures (Soussana and Lemaire, 2014). Intensification or conversion of grasslands to crop production can lead to the reduction or loss of such benefits (Dusseux et al., 2015). At the same time, ruminants valorise marginal production areas, converting plant materials indigestible to humans into meat and dairy products with high efficiency in terms of the consumption of human-edible food per unit of product (Wheeler and Reynolds, 2013, Wilkinson, 2011). In Europe, around 25% of livestock protein intake comes from grasslands (Leip et al., 2011). Despite these benefits, grasslands have declined in Europe, with an estimated loss of seven million hectares between 1967 and 2007 (Huyghe et al., 2014). Recent predictions suggest that this decline may continue in a climate change future (Leclère et al., 2013). In this context, a better understanding is required of the impacts of climate change on European grassland systems, the efficacy of adaptation strategies to increase their resilience and productivity, and the pathways available to maintain and enhance the essential ecosystem services they provide (Scollan et al., 2010, Smith et al., 2013).

In light of the challenges described, modelling can offer valuable support to farm and policy level decision-makers, by providing tools to explore the performance of biophysical, management and policy systems in the context of future climatic and socio-economic scenarios (Graux et al., 2013, Kipling et al., 2014). A number of high-level strategic assessments of agricultural research priorities (ATF, 2013, ATF, 2014, FACCE-JPI, 2012, Soussana, 2014) present a range of challenges to the agricultural modelling community (Kipling et al., in press). The aim of this paper is to lay out in detail the specific challenges and research priorities that grassland modelling must address, if it is to fulfil its potential role in helping to tackle the global problems faced by the livestock production sector. The focus of the paper is on European grasslands, and covers both permanent grasslands and leys (grasslands established for less than five years). Three broad types of model applied to European grasslands have previously been identified (Bellocchi et al., 2013); specialised grassland models, crop models with grassland options, and vegetation models that can characterise a range of plant communities including grasslands. This paper incorporates challenges relevant for all of these model types, and explores links to other modelling disciplines and approaches.

Section snippets

Methods

In order to understand the challenges and research priorities for grassland modelling, a ‘horizon scanning’ approach based on that of Pretty et al. (2010) was used to gain the views of grassland modellers and researchers from 18 institutes across 10 countries. The experts were drawn from, or known to, partners contributing to a large European modelling network, the Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change Joint Programming Initiative (FACCE JPI) knowledge hub Modelling European Agriculture

Challenges and priorities for modelling

The workshop and questionnaire responses identified fifteen challenges. Twelve of these could be categorized using the different aspects of grassland systems under climate change depicted in Fig. 1, and three were cross-cutting challenges (Table 1). The first category of challenges relate to ‘direct and indirect climate change effects on the sward’. Challenges one to three refer to biophysical interactions which will require improved modelling in the context of climate change. These are

Synthesis

The fifteen challenges for grassland modelling identified here (Table 1) cover all aspects of modelling. Although many of the challenges have been discussed in previous reviews, such as Bryant and Snow (2008); Snow et al. (2014) and Holzworth et al. (2015), to the authors' knowledge this has been the first attempt to comprehensively assess the challenges and priorities for European grassland modelling in the context of climate change, using a collaborative horizon scanning approach. In

Conclusions

The horizon scanning exercise presented in this paper identified 15 challenges to European grassland modelling in the context of climate change (Table 1), considered the current state of modelling in relation to each challenge, and presented pathways to improving model capacity. The responses of participants to this exercise highlighted the need for the creation of shared resources within the grassland modelling community, in order to 1) allow stakeholders to identify and select modelling tools

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the FACCE-JPI knowledge hub MACSUR with national funding from BBSRC and Scottish Government (UK), EL&I (The Netherlands), INRA (France), MIPAAF (Italy), MMM (Finland), RCN (Norway), SPW (Belgium), The National Centre for Research and Development (Poland), FORMAS (Sweden), JÜLICH and BLE (Germany). The authors would like to thank Dr. Panu Korhonen (Luke) and two anonymous reviewers for their contributions to the revision of this paper.

References (141)

  • D.P. Holzworth et al.

    Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects

    Environ. Model Softw.

    (2015)
  • A. Iglesias et al.

    Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2015)
  • G. Jégo et al.

    Calibration and performance evaluation of the STICS crop model for simulating timothy growth and nutritive value

    Field Crop Res.

    (2013)
  • G. Jégo et al.

    Improved snow-cover model for multi-annual simulations with the STICS crop model under cold, humid continental climates

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2014)
  • Q. Jing et al.

    Regrowth simulation of the perennial grass timothy

    Ecol. Model.

    (2012)
  • K.C. Kersebaum et al.

    Analysis and classification of data sets for calibration and validation of agro-ecosystem models

    Environ. Model Softw.

    (2015)
  • P. Lazzarotto et al.

    Dynamics of grass-clover mixtures-an analysis of the response to management with the PROductive GRASsland Simulator (PROGRASS)

    Ecol. Model.

    (2009)
  • D. Leclère et al.

    Farm-level autonomous adaptation of European agricultural supply to climate change

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2013)
  • R.S. Llewellyn

    Information quality and effectiveness for more rapid adoption decisions by farmers

    Field Crop Res.

    (2007)
  • S.P. Long et al.

    More than taking the heat: crops and global change

    Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.

    (2010)
  • G. Lyle

    Understanding the nested, multi-scale, spatial and hierarchical nature of future climate change adaptation decision making in agricultural regions: a narrative literature review

    J. Rural. Stud.

    (2015)
  • M. Merkens et al.

    Landscape and field characteristics affecting winter waterfowl grazing damage to agricultural perennial forage crops on the lower Fraser River delta, BC, Canada

    Crop. Prot.

    (2012)
  • D. Nyfeler et al.

    Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2011)
  • E.S. Pilgrim et al.

    Interactions among agricultural production and other ecosystem services delivered from European temperate grasslands

    Adv. Agron.

    (2010)
  • M. Rapacz et al.

    Overwintering of herbaceous plants in a changing climate. Still more questions than answers

    Plant Sci.

    (2014)
  • I. Rossetti et al.

    Isolated cork oak trees affect soil properties and biodiversity in a Mediterranean wooded grassland

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2015)
  • R. Sándor et al.

    Modelling of grassland fluxes in Europe: evaluation of two biogeochemical models

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2016)
  • L.A. Smith et al.

    The effect of grazing management on livestock exposure to parasites via the faecal–oral route

    Prev. Vet. Med.

    (2009)
  • W.N. Adger

    Social and ecological resilience: are they related?

    Prog. Hum. Geogr.

    (2000)
  • AFRC

    Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 11

    (1998)
  • J.E. Annetts et al.

    Multiple objective linear programming for environmental farm planning

    J. Oper. Res. Soc.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Antle et al.

    AgMIP's transdisciplinary agricultural systems approach to regional integrated assessment of climate impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation

  • ATF

    Research and innovation for a sustainable livestock sector in Europe: suggested priorities for support under Horizon 2020 to enhance innovation and sustainability in the animal production sector of Europe's food supply chains

  • ATF

    Research and innovation for a competitive and sustainable animal production sector in Europe: recommended priorities for support under Horizon 2020 in the 2016/2017 programme

  • E. Audsley et al.

    Interactively modelling land profitability to estimate European agricultural and forest land use under future scenarios of climate, socio-economics and adaptation

    Clim. Chang.

    (2015)
  • D. Baldocchi et al.

    FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem–scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities

    Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2001)
  • G. Bellocchi et al.

    Identified grassland-livestock production systems and related models

  • G. Bellocchi et al.

    Deliberative processes for comprehensive evaluation of agroecological models. A review

    Agron. Sustain. Dev.

    (2015)
  • A. Bertrand et al.

    Yield and nutritive value of timothy as affected by temperature, photoperiod and time of harvest

    Grass Forage Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.D. Bever et al.

    Maintenance of plant species diversity by pathogens

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.

    (2015)
  • M.M. Blomqvist et al.

    Interactions between above- and belowground biota: importance for small-scale vegetation mosaics in a grassland ecosystem

    Oikos

    (2000)
  • D.M. Broom et al.

    Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2013)
  • J.R. Bryant et al.

    Modelling pastoral farm agro-ecosystems: a review

    N. Z. J. Agric. Res.

    (2008)
  • Campion M, Ninane M, Hautier L, Dufrêne M, Stilmant D. BIOECOSYS: Towards the development of a decision support tool to...
  • S.R. Carpenter et al.

    General resilience to cope with extreme events

    Sustainability

    (2012)
  • D. Courault et al.

    Combined use of FORMOSAT-2 images with a crop model for biomass and water monitoring of permanent grassland in Mediterranean region

    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.

    (2010)
  • T.W. Crowther et al.

    Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Del Prado A, Crosson P, Olesen JE, Rotz CA. Whole-farm models to quantify greenhouse gas emissions and their potential...
  • N.R. Dhamala et al.

    Competitive forbs in high-producing temporary grasslands with perennial ryegrass and red clover can increase plant diversity and herbage yield

  • W.I.J. Dieleman et al.

    Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature

    Glob. Chang. Biol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Dynamic simulation of management events for assessing impacts of climate change on pre-alpine grassland productivity

      2021, European Journal of Agronomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our study demonstrates the importance of dynamic rules for adapting management activities to changing environmental conditions in the context of model-based assessments of climate change impacts on grassland productivity. This finding highly supports the statement of Kipling et al. (2016) that the application and validation of different management strategies suitable for climate change conditions remains a key challenge for modelling studies targeting European grassland systems. We successfully implemented our dynamic management module with a focus on pre-alpine grassland systems, yet we argue that setting cuts on the fly of simulations is feasible also for other regions of concern.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text